// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -fsyntax-only -verify %s // Exception specification compatibility. // We test function pointers, because functions have an extra rule in p4. // Same type is compatible extern void (*r1)() throw(int); extern void (*r1)() throw(int); // Typedefs don't matter. typedef int INT; extern void (*r2)() throw(int); extern void (*r2)() throw(INT); // Order doesn't matter. extern void (*r3)() throw(int, float); extern void (*r3)() throw(float, int); // MS throw-any spec and no spec at all are compatible extern void (*r4)(); extern void (*r4)() throw(...); // throw(X) and no spec are not compatible extern void (*r5)() throw(int); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r5)(); // expected-error {{exception specification in declaration does not match}} // throw(int) and no spec are not compatible extern void f5() throw(int); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void f5(); // expected-error {{missing exception specification}} // Different types are not compatible. extern void (*r7)() throw(int); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r7)() throw(float); // expected-error {{exception specification in declaration does not match}} // Top-level const doesn't matter. extern void (*r8)() throw(int); extern void (*r8)() throw(const int); // Multiple appearances don't matter. extern void (*r9)() throw(int, int); extern void (*r9)() throw(int, int); // noexcept is compatible with itself extern void (*r10)() noexcept; extern void (*r10)() noexcept; // noexcept(true) is compatible with noexcept extern void (*r11)() noexcept; extern void (*r11)() noexcept(true); // noexcept(false) isn't extern void (*r12)() noexcept; // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r12)() noexcept(false); // expected-error {{does not match}} // The form of the boolean expression doesn't matter. extern void (*r13)() noexcept(1 < 2); extern void (*r13)() noexcept(2 > 1); // noexcept(false) is incompatible with noexcept(true) extern void (*r14)() noexcept(true); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r14)() noexcept(false); // expected-error {{does not match}} // noexcept(false) is compatible with itself extern void (*r15)() noexcept(false); extern void (*r15)() noexcept(false); // noexcept(false) is compatible with MS throw(...) extern void (*r16)() noexcept(false); extern void (*r16)() throw(...); // noexcept(false) is *not* compatible with no spec extern void (*r17)(); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r17)() noexcept(false); // expected-error {{does not match}} // except for functions void f17(); void f17() noexcept(false); // noexcept(false) is compatible with dynamic specs that throw unless // CWG 1073 resolution is accepted. Clang implements it. //extern void (*r18)() throw(int); //extern void (*r18)() noexcept(false); // noexcept(true) is compatible with dynamic specs that don't throw extern void (*r19)() throw(); extern void (*r19)() noexcept(true); // The other way round doesn't work. extern void (*r20)() throw(); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r20)() noexcept(false); // expected-error {{does not match}} extern void (*r21)() throw(int); // expected-note {{previous declaration}} extern void (*r21)() noexcept(true); // expected-error {{does not match}} // As a very special workaround, we allow operator new to match no spec // with a throw(bad_alloc) spec, because C++0x makes an incompatible change // here. extern "C++" { namespace std { class bad_alloc {}; } } typedef decltype(sizeof(int)) mysize_t; void* operator new(mysize_t) throw(std::bad_alloc); void* operator new(mysize_t); void* operator new[](mysize_t); void* operator new[](mysize_t) throw(std::bad_alloc); template void equivalent() noexcept (X); template void equivalent() noexcept (X); template void not_equivalent() noexcept (X); // expected-note {{previous}} template void not_equivalent() noexcept (Y); // expected-error {{does not match}} template void missing() noexcept (X); // expected-note {{previous}} // FIXME: The missing exception specification that we report here doesn't make // sense in the context of this declaration. template void missing(); // expected-error {{missing exception specification 'noexcept(X)'}}